<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Paul te Braak</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paultebraak.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paultebraak.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Business Intelligence Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 21:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SSAS Relationships and Granularity by Pearl</title>
		<link>http://paultebraak.wordpress.com/2011/10/03/relationships-and-granularity/#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pearl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultebraak.wordpress.com/2011/10/03/relationships-and-granularity/#comment-541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to 
say that I&#039;ve really enjoyed surfing around your blog posts. After all I&#039;ll be subscribing 
to your rss feed and I hope you write again soon!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to<br />
say that I&#8217;ve really enjoyed surfing around your blog posts. After all I&#8217;ll be subscribing<br />
to your rss feed and I hope you write again soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DAX III &#8211; Filtering Queries with CALCULATETABLE and FILTER by buy Edu links</title>
		<link>http://paultebraak.wordpress.com/2012/08/01/dax-iii-filtering-queries-with-calculatetable-and-filter/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[buy Edu links]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 17:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultebraak.wordpress.com/?p=481#comment-540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its not my first time to visit this web site, i am browsing this web 
page dailly and get fastidious data from here every day.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its not my first time to visit this web site, i am browsing this web<br />
page dailly and get fastidious data from here every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Creating Custom Calculations in Excel with Pivot Table Extensions by Siraj Samsudeen</title>
		<link>http://paultebraak.wordpress.com/2013/03/05/creating-custom-calculations-in-excel-with-pivot-table-extensions/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siraj Samsudeen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultebraak.wordpress.com/?p=575#comment-534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent article on how we can use this extension even on simple pivot tables. The tip about extracting the fully qualified name from GETPIVOTDATA is wonderful. Thanks for sharing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article on how we can use this extension even on simple pivot tables. The tip about extracting the fully qualified name from GETPIVOTDATA is wonderful. Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Managing Connections In Power Pivot by Jim `Hutch` Hutcheson</title>
		<link>http://paultebraak.wordpress.com/2013/01/15/managing-connections-in-power-pivot/#comment-529</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim `Hutch` Hutcheson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 18:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultebraak.wordpress.com/?p=539#comment-529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very strange, have to have version 2 of Powerpivot for Excel 2010 add-in installed and everything works fine, If version different – issues, no add-in issues.  Any good write-up talking about restrictions between versions?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very strange, have to have version 2 of Powerpivot for Excel 2010 add-in installed and everything works fine, If version different – issues, no add-in issues.  Any good write-up talking about restrictions between versions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Managing Connections In Power Pivot by Paul te Braak</title>
		<link>http://paultebraak.wordpress.com/2013/01/15/managing-connections-in-power-pivot/#comment-528</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul te Braak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 18:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultebraak.wordpress.com/?p=539#comment-528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can you open the PPVT widow and see the data model?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you open the PPVT widow and see the data model?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Managing Connections In Power Pivot by Jim Hutcheson</title>
		<link>http://paultebraak.wordpress.com/2013/01/15/managing-connections-in-power-pivot/#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hutcheson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 18:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultebraak.wordpress.com/?p=539#comment-527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I cut/pasted the data into a blank excel sheet, re-did me slicers, etc.  I made sure there were no connections listed.  When I open the spreadsheet up in Excel 2010 with and without powerpivot add-in get error stating Initialization of the data source failed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cut/pasted the data into a blank excel sheet, re-did me slicers, etc.  I made sure there were no connections listed.  When I open the spreadsheet up in Excel 2010 with and without powerpivot add-in get error stating Initialization of the data source failed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Designing Good Dimensions in SSAS by Paul te Braak</title>
		<link>http://paultebraak.wordpress.com/2013/03/15/designing-good-dimensions-in-ssas/#comment-526</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul te Braak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 17:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultebraak.wordpress.com/?p=601#comment-526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Bhavik,

Devils always in the detail!  - But I think this is a classic type 6 dimension – no? So retain the type 2 data for the hierarchy (historic) and type 1 for the ‘current [level 3] org hierarchy’ (attribute hierarchy) based on the name.

In your report, you could always filter by the hierarchy level and list the user attribute members that exist (which would ensure showing a single name).

However (as you nodoubt know), this (in my opinion) is really a training exercise for adhoc users.  They need to be made aware that the two sets of attributes are not the same. 

HTH, Paul
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bhavik,</p>
<p>Devils always in the detail!  &#8211; But I think this is a classic type 6 dimension – no? So retain the type 2 data for the hierarchy (historic) and type 1 for the ‘current [level 3] org hierarchy’ (attribute hierarchy) based on the name.</p>
<p>In your report, you could always filter by the hierarchy level and list the user attribute members that exist (which would ensure showing a single name).</p>
<p>However (as you nodoubt know), this (in my opinion) is really a training exercise for adhoc users.  They need to be made aware that the two sets of attributes are not the same. </p>
<p>HTH, Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Managing Connections In Power Pivot by Paul te Braak</title>
		<link>http://paultebraak.wordpress.com/2013/01/15/managing-connections-in-power-pivot/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul te Braak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultebraak.wordpress.com/?p=539#comment-525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Jim,

Not in Excel, although if you are sure that the data will not change, then perhaps just paste it in (this will not create a connection).  If you are going to deploy the model to the server as an SSAS DB (with linked s/s), you’ll lose the connection anyway.

HTH, Paul]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jim,</p>
<p>Not in Excel, although if you are sure that the data will not change, then perhaps just paste it in (this will not create a connection).  If you are going to deploy the model to the server as an SSAS DB (with linked s/s), you’ll lose the connection anyway.</p>
<p>HTH, Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Managing Connections In Power Pivot by Jim Hutcheson</title>
		<link>http://paultebraak.wordpress.com/2013/01/15/managing-connections-in-power-pivot/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Hutcheson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultebraak.wordpress.com/?p=539#comment-524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there a way to delete the connections after the initial load of data, so you load from MS Access - don&#039;t need to refresh ever again.  Doesn&#039;t seem to let me delete the connection.  I thought info stored in worksheet, just don&#039;t want spreadsheet to ever try to link to connection again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a way to delete the connections after the initial load of data, so you load from MS Access &#8211; don&#8217;t need to refresh ever again.  Doesn&#8217;t seem to let me delete the connection.  I thought info stored in worksheet, just don&#8217;t want spreadsheet to ever try to link to connection again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Designing Good Dimensions in SSAS by bhavikmerchant</title>
		<link>http://paultebraak.wordpress.com/2013/03/15/designing-good-dimensions-in-ssas/#comment-523</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bhavikmerchant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paultebraak.wordpress.com/?p=601#comment-523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Paul,

Havent seen you in a while! Hope Brissie is treating you well

I have an issue im currently working on with a similar scenario. We have an SCD2 dimension where there are duplicate names caused by current version and older versions of a business unit which are part of a 3 level org hierarchy. The older versions belong to a different parent. The key is composite on 4 attributes.. the 3 &quot;level&quot; keys and an &quot;is_current&quot; flag.

We need results across the version to show up on a single row (since the name is still the same), but not just for a chosen member. The query needs to return the whole org hierarchy, flattened to not have duplicates.

Furthermore this issue is complicated by the fact that this is in an SSRS report and the users can select any items at any level from the org hierarchy as a parameter to the report. I currently have the parameter dataset restricted to just the current versions so as not to show the users duplicates. 

The problem I am have is how to get the main report query to accept those selections (in a STRTOSET), but return all the relevant data with no duplicates showing up. 

I haven&#039;t spent much time on it but hit a few roadblocks and am tackling it again next week.
Can you think of anything?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul,</p>
<p>Havent seen you in a while! Hope Brissie is treating you well</p>
<p>I have an issue im currently working on with a similar scenario. We have an SCD2 dimension where there are duplicate names caused by current version and older versions of a business unit which are part of a 3 level org hierarchy. The older versions belong to a different parent. The key is composite on 4 attributes.. the 3 &#8220;level&#8221; keys and an &#8220;is_current&#8221; flag.</p>
<p>We need results across the version to show up on a single row (since the name is still the same), but not just for a chosen member. The query needs to return the whole org hierarchy, flattened to not have duplicates.</p>
<p>Furthermore this issue is complicated by the fact that this is in an SSRS report and the users can select any items at any level from the org hierarchy as a parameter to the report. I currently have the parameter dataset restricted to just the current versions so as not to show the users duplicates. </p>
<p>The problem I am have is how to get the main report query to accept those selections (in a STRTOSET), but return all the relevant data with no duplicates showing up. </p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t spent much time on it but hit a few roadblocks and am tackling it again next week.<br />
Can you think of anything?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
